Kids, toxic smoke and inequality

Read Time:6 Minute, 41 Second
Kids, toxic smoke and inequality

Welcome to the Climate Fwd: newsletter. The New York Times climate team emails readers once a week with stories and insights about climate change. Sign up here to get it in your inbox.

I grew up in the age of smog in Southern California. I lived for a few years in one of the world’s most polluted cities, Delhi. I once took my daughter on vacation to the city where I was born, Calcutta, only to rush her to the emergency room because she couldn’t breathe; the pollution hung low and thick in the air.

And so, when I heard that researchers were looking into the impact of wildfire smoke in California, I thought about its effect on children. How have kids been coping with smoke during this extraordinary wildfire season, I wondered? And how were children who lived in already-polluted parts of the state handling the additional assault of wildfire smoke on their lungs, especially those in Fresno, where truck traffic and chemicals from the fields makes the air among the worst in the country?

I began by consulting two researchers at Stanford University: Dr. Kari Nadeau, a pediatric asthma specialist who has been studying the effects of air pollution on the health of children for many years, and Marshall Burke, an economist who analyzes the social and economic impacts of climate change and whose 8-year-old daughter, Zella, has asthma.

Dr. Nadeau explained why exposure to wildfire smoke was so worrisome. It contains the same fine particulate matter that’s found in conventional sources of pollution and that her research has shown to have long-lasting effects on a child’s immune system. Wildfire smoke contains other toxic stuff, too, as entire neighborhoods go up in flames. Dr. Nadeau worries its impact could be worse than ordinary smog and last forever, too.

Dr. Burke explained how smoke pollution was beginning to reverse the gains that California had made in recent decades in improving its air quality. But it was his own personal experience that clued me in to how inequitable the impact of wildfire smoke pollution can be.

Dr. Burke lives in a Bay Area suburb where the air is very clean for most of the year. He can buy the best air purifiers on the market. He can avail the best care for his daughter — and when the smoke gets really bad, as it did this year, he and his wife can rent a house out of state and get away.

To get a sense of the health effects of wildfire smoke, I spoke to three dozen doctors, nurses, and their patients in the Bay Area and in the Central Valley. How children cope, I learned, depends so much on things beyond their control, like where they live and what their parents can afford. It’s yet another way that the human toll of climate change can be profoundly unfair.

By

The holiday shopping season has started, and spending on toys is expected to be big this year as parents try to fight lockdown boredom.

Toy sales in the United States increased by more than 15 percent in the first half of 2020, according to the NPD Group, a research firm that tracks consumer trends, and the surge is expected to continue into the holidays.

The problem: That toy boom potentially means a lot more plastic in the environment.

According to one industry publication, roughly 90 percent of toys are made from plastics. That’s because they generally need to be durable, easy to clean and bright in color.

And that plastic tends to stick around a very long time. “It’s safe to assume all toys eventually end up in a landfill,” said Shahram Baradaran, a quality assurance and compliance manager at Green Toys, a California company that makes sustainable toys.

So, if you want to reduce your environmental footprint this holiday season, there are toy companies offering green options.

Mr. Baradaran’s company, for example, uses only recycled material. Green Toys gets most of its plastic from old milk jugs, but not all. One play set for the pool and beach is made from plastics that most likely would have ended up in the ocean: The company sourced the material for the sets from a provider that removes plastic from waterways in developing countries.

Then, there’s wooden toys. Look for companies that source their wood sustainably. One example is PlanToys, based in Trang, Thailand. The company specializes in wooden kitchen sets and trucks and uses wood from retired rubber trees that no longer produce latex. Those trees would otherwise be burned down.

“We’re very proud to say we’ve never actually cut down a tree to create any of our toys,” said Rudy Valenta, national sales and marketing manager at PlanToys.

Unfortunately, there’s no consumer group that ranks toys based on sustainability, but there are some companies with good reputations.

Poppie Toys is a Dutch company that specializes in sustainable rattan toys like doll furniture and strollers. Green Tones, established by German music company Hohner, makes sustainable rubberwood drum sets and xylophones with nontoxic glue for children. Oli & Carol, based in Spain, focuses on plant-based, soft teething rings and bath toys in the shapes of bright pink watermelons and frisky foxes. Wishbone in New Zealand makes bikes and wagons for tots sourced from birch wood or recycled plastic.

Some of the big toymakers are also moving toward greater sustainability. LEGO, for example, is replacing the plastic bags that contain bricks with paper ones. And, it’s already introduced bricks made from sugar cane.

LEGO has a program to make sure bricks stay in circulation, too. You can send back those old sets after your kids have outgrown them. The company will sort and clean the bricks and then redistribute them through charities like Teach for America.

In fact, selling, donating and buying used might be the best ways to rein in your environmental footprint when it comes to toys.

You might not be comfortable giving used toys, especially on a big occasion. That’s a personal choice. But keep in mind, there are probably people out there in need. So, if you don’t want to buy used, you can still donate.

Good donation options for lightly used toys are local women’s shelters or thrift stores. The Marine Toys for Tots Foundation also accepts used toys in good condition and passes them on to families who can’t afford to buy new ones. Another possibility is Second Chance Toys.

“More and more we’re recognizing that there really is no end for plastics. They leave our house but they’re sitting someplace out there,” said Liz Hitchcock, director of Safer Chemicals Healthy Families. “We are developing greater recognition that from extraction through production through disposal, it’s all harmful to the environment.”


This year has forced us to rethink and change many aspects of our lives. You’ve probably been flying less, using more electricity at home and spending more time outdoors. Team Climate is curious to know whether those changes will influence your New Year’s resolutions (if you’re into that).

If so, let us know in one sentence what you’re planning to do differently in 2021 — your personal climate pledge, if you will, whether big or small. We might use your contributions for a project on personal resolutions! Please include your name and the state you live in: climateteam@nytimes.com

We’d love your feedback on this newsletter. We read every message, and reply to many! Please email thoughts and suggestions to climateteam@nytimes.com.

If you like what we’re doing, please spread the word and send this to your friends. You can sign up here to get our newsletter delivered to your inbox each week.

And be sure to check out our full assortment of free newsletters from The Times.

Source: New York Times

0 0
Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleppy
Sleppy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *